|
|
Letter to lily
This letter was sent
after the folks who had lied to lily had "ejected her from their
lives". They were upset that people knew of their collusion and deceit,
and therefore, began to take aim at the person who had sought help from their
lies.
It is interesting (on the one hand)
that they should say that lily is violating the law by "giving out
personal information", and (on the other hand) then (actually) violate
federal law by transmitting a threat via an electronic means.
~J {LoD}
If you are still reading along, this is me (Joseph) again. I would apologize for a few of the misspellings and syntax errors of the above letter, but then... I didn't write it. For the record, the 'stupid people' the authors refer to in the lambasting of lily who 'do not even know each other' are friends who have met and gotten together in real life. Besides showing grotesque misconceptions about the dynamics of BDSM (ie: I never wanted to be any kind of Dom, but I am a Dom to your ass. Forever), no concept about the meaning of honor (as demonstrated in their manner of threatening all those who disagree with them [ie: HAVE been TURNED IN FOR ASKING FOR THIS ON THE NET TO THE FEDERAL BEAUR"], the lies about themselves and their experience, and the manner in which physical harm is threatened for a perceived insult). They (obviously) also have no conception of fealty for their 'friends'. Lily had asked me to 'check these people out' (she wanted me to be as pleased with her friends as she was. Our approval means a lot to her and it is endearing). I went to their chat room. In the space of five minutes 'Samantha' made several serious lies and half truths about herself and her experience. I politely questioned her on these statements and was promptly booted from their MSN chat room. Shortly thereafter, despite witnesses to the conversation, these people concocted allegations that I had denigrated a person who was not there and whom I really did not know (they have since stated that I have done the same to the author of this letter... which is patently untrue). During the course of my discussions with lily, while trying to tell her (as nicely as I could) about the deceit and fables they were propagating, these folks had cited http://www.castlerealm.com as one source of their information for proof.I wrote to and received a reply from Lord Colm, owner of the site and a 'cyber acquaintance' of mine from years past, who rebuffed their assertions. Whereas, before this incident, they were praising his web site - http://www.castlerealm.com - as a veritable 'book of the bible' for BDSM, they turned on him and his works when his reply negated their lies.(By the way, if you are wondering who "Jake" is in the letter above, I believe they are referring to "Jade" the pseudonym of Lord Colm's real life submissive, who passed away in 1999. >>Obviously they knew her well<<.) Within the context of this letter are several foibles: 1. There are ancient or old "Houses" where 'traditional' BDSM is taught. (see article on houses) 2. It is illegal to post, mention or tell another someone's personal information on line. If this were the case, we could not conduct e-commerce, we could not exchange phone numbers, and/or we could not even get on line - as the internet service providers could not get your credit card information. If I were a mean individual, I would post all of these people's real life names, phone numbers and addresses for your perusal and STILL be within the bounds of the law... but I am not that mean, or that angry. 3. There is a thing such as "Olde Guard". This is partially true, but not in the context that these folks mean it. (See articles and links on 'Old Guard'). |
|
Website & Graphics by my girl (subtleigh), with a special thanks to Tessa of Australia for the BDSM Debunking the Myths logo. |